Stereolithography (SLA) vs. Selective Laser Sintering (SLS): Choose the Best 3D Printing Method for Your Needs
Table of Contents
The Problem: Confused About Which 3D Printing Technology to Use?
Are you stuck trying to figure out if SLA or SLS is right for your project? Many of our customers at Istar Machining face this same problem. You need parts made fast. You need them to be strong. You need them to look good. But which 3D printing technology will give you the best results? The wrong choice can mean:
Parts that break too easily
Rough surfaces when you need smooth ones
Paying too much money
Getting parts that can’t handle heat or stress
The Situation Gets Worse
The more you look into it, the more confusing it gets. One website says use SLA. Another says SLS is better. If you pick the wrong technology, you might:
Waste money on parts that fail
Miss deadlines when parts need to be remade
Lose customers who aren’t happy with the results
Ruin your project before it even gets started At Istar Machining, we see customers make these mistakes all the time. But we can help you pick the right path.
The Solution: Know Exactly How SLA and SLS Compare
We have put together this complete guide to help you understand the differences between SLA and SLS 3D printing. By the end, you’ll know exactly which technology is right for your needs.
How SLA and SLS Work: The Basics
SLA (Stereolithography)
SLA uses a liquid resin that turns hard when hit with a laser. The process works like this:
A platform dips into a vat of liquid resin
A laser draws the first layer, hardening the resin
The platform moves up slightly
The next layer is drawn
After printing, parts need cleaning and extra curing
SLS (Selective Laser Sintering)
SLS uses powdered materials that get fused together by a laser. Here’s how it works:
A layer of powder is spread across the build area
A laser melts (sinters) the powder where the part should be
The platform moves down slightly
A new layer of powder is added
After printing, parts need to cool and have powder removed
Material Options: What Can You Make?
Let’s look at what materials each technology can use:
SLA Materials
SLS Materials
Standard resins
Nylon (PA 11/12)
Ceramic-filled resins
TPU (flexible)
Clear resins
Aluminum-filled nylon
Biocompatible resins
Metals (through DMLS)
Dental resins
Heat-resistant polymers
Key Point: SLS can use metals, but SLA cannot.
How Strong Are the Parts?
When it comes to strength, SLS parts are usually stronger:
SLA parts:
Good for models and prototypes
Can be brittle
Not good for parts that snap together
Strength: 50-70 MPa
SLS parts:
Good for working parts
Can take more stress
Better for parts that need to bend without breaking
Strength: 45-70 MPa
At Istar Machining, we help customers pick the right process based on how strong parts need to be.
How Do the Parts Look?
The surface finish is very different between these technologies:
SLA Surface Quality
Very smooth surfaces
Fine details (25-100 µm layers)
Can be clear/transparent
Looks almost like injection molded parts
SLS Surface Quality
Gritty texture like sandpaper
Less detailed (80-150 µm layers)
Always opaque
Porous surface
Which Technology Costs More?
Cost is often a deciding factor. Here’s how they compare:
Cost Factor
SLA
SLS
Machine Cost
$3,750-$20,000
$10,000-$650,000
Material Cost
Higher ($50-$200 per liter)
Lower (powder can be reused)
Part Cost
$20-$200
$50-$500
Post-Processing
More steps needed
Less work needed
Applications: When to Use Each Technology
Best Uses for SLA
Detailed visual models
Dental models and guides
Clear parts (like lenses or fluid channels)
Master patterns for molds
Jewelry prototypes
Best Uses for SLS
Functional prototypes that need to work
Complex parts with moving features
End-use parts that need to be strong
Heat-resistant components
Metal parts (through DMLS)
Size Limitations
Each technology has limits on how big parts can be:
SLA Build Volumes
Desktop: 145 × 145 × 175 mm
Industrial: Up to 1500 × 750 × 550 mm
SLS Build Volumes
Desktop: 150 × 200 × 150 mm
Industrial: Up to 700 × 380 × 560 mm
Design Considerations
When designing parts, remember these key differences:
SLA Design Tips
Needs support structures that must be removed
Can have thin walls (0.5-1mm)
Best for organic shapes
Good for text and logos
SLS Design Tips
No support structures needed (powder supports the part)
Good for complex internal shapes
Can make interlocking parts in one print
Needs escape holes for trapped powder
Safety and Environmental Factors
Both technologies have safety concerns:
SLA Safety
Toxic resins before curing
Need gloves and eye protection
Need good ventilation
Creates liquid waste
SLS Safety
Powder inhalation risks
Fire risks with some materials
Needs special disposal for waste powder
Needs good dust control
Real-World Applications
Let’s look at how these technologies are used in real industries:
Dental Uses
SLA: Biocompatible resins make precise surgical guides and models
SLS: Rarely used due to limited biocompatible powders
Aerospace Uses
SLA: Used for non-structural parts like housings
SLS: Used for functional ducts and brackets that can handle heat
Consumer Products
SLA: Used for smooth, detailed prototypes
SLS: Used for snap-fit parts and functional prototypes
Sometimes 3D printing isn’t the best choice. At Istar Machining, we recommend CNC machining when you need:
Higher strength parts
Tighter tolerances
Metal parts with specific properties
Production quantities
Materials not available in 3D printing
Decision Guide: Which Technology Should You Choose?
Choose SLA When You Need:
High detail and smooth surfaces
Clear or translucent parts
Biocompatible materials
Dental or medical applications
Visual prototypes that look great
Choose SLS When You Need:
Functional parts that can take stress
Complex geometries without supports
Flexible materials
Heat resistance
Metal parts through DMLS
Case Studies: Real Examples
Case Study 1: Medical Device Prototype
A medical device company needed a prototype with fine details and biocompatible materials. They chose SLA because:
It could produce the small features
It had FDA-approved resins
The smooth surface was easier to sterilize
Case Study 2: Automotive Component
A car parts manufacturer needed a functional prototype that could handle heat and stress. They chose SLS because:
The nylon material could handle the heat
The part needed to snap into place
The complex internal structure would be hard to make with supports
Comparing Speed: Which is Faster?
When time matters, here’s how they compare:
Time Factor
SLA
SLS
Print Speed
Faster for small parts
Faster for multiple parts
Post-Processing
1-3 hours
0.5-2 hours
Total Time
1-2 days
2-3 days
How to Prepare Your Files
For the best results with either technology:
Export as STL file
Check for watertight meshes
Add supports for SLA models
Orient parts to reduce supports
Consider build orientation for strength
Combining Technologies for Best Results
Smart companies often use both technologies:
SLA for detailed master patterns
SLS for functional testing
CNC machining for final production
At Istar Machining, we can help you with both 3D printing and CNC machining for the perfect workflow.
Technical Specs Comparison Table
Parameter
SLA
SLS
Process
Laser-cured liquid resin
Laser-sintered powder
Layer Thickness
25-100 µm
80-150 µm
Materials
Photopolymer resins
Nylon, TPU, Metals
Strength
50-70 MPa
45-70 MPa
Accuracy
±0.1-0.5 mm
±0.3-0.5 mm
Surface
Smooth
Gritty
Support Needed
Yes
No
Post-curing
Yes
No
Cost (Desktop)
$3,750-$20,000
$10,000-$25,000
Cost (Industrial)
$20,000+
$100,000-$650,000
Final Thoughts
The choice between SLA and SLS comes down to what matters most for your project:
Choose SLA for beautiful, detailed visual models
Choose SLS for functional, strong working parts
Still not sure? Talk to our experts at Istar Machining. We can help you pick the right technology or even suggest when CNC machining might be a better choice than 3D printing. Ready to get started? Contact us today for a quote on your next project.
Share your love
Kevin
Hello, my name is Kevin, and I'm a proud member of the Istar Machining team. As one of China's top 5 CNC machining factories, we are dedicated to delivering high-precision components and exceptional service. I work closely with our clients and internal teams to ensure project success and satisfaction. It's a pleasure to connect with you.
New Product Brochure
Please enter your email address below and we will send you the latest brochure!